Traduction de «droit d'exception » (Français → Anglais) :

exception to rights conferred by a patent

legal person governed by public law save for those which are non-profit- making

exception clause

peremptory plea [ plea in bar of trial | plea in bar | defense in bar | bar defense | objection at law | litis contestation negative | objection to admissibility ]

ITAAP exception [ Information Technology Asset Alignment Program exception ]

control by exception

gold-circle rate | red-circle rate | red circle rate

9. Notes that 56 % of Europeans use the internet for cultural purposes and notes, therefore, the importance of several copyright exceptions; reminds the Commission that the majority of MEPs support the examination of the application of minimum standards across the exceptions and limitations to copyright and the proper application of those exceptions and limitations which are set out in Directive 2001/29/EC; underlines that the approach to copyright exceptions and limitations should be balanced, targeted and format-neutral and should only be based on demonstrated needs, and should be without prejudice to EU cultural diversity, its finan ...[+++]cing and the fair compensation of authors; emphasises that while the use of text and data mining needs greater legal certainty to enable researchers and educational institutions to make wider use of copyright-protected material, including across borders, any EU-wide exception for text and data mining should apply only when the user has lawful access, and should be developed in consultation with all stakeholders following an evidence-based impact assessment;

N. whereas Directive 2001/29/EC provides for a legal framework on copyright and related rights and a system for their protection; whereas Article 5 of the directive presents an exhaustive list of exceptions and limitations, thereby preventing Member States from introducing new exceptions and limitations; whereas ACTA seeks to further extend the level of protection for rights holders by providing for more extensive copyright enforcement powers, but does not address the possibility of expanding the scope of existing exceptions and limitations and may constrain the discretion of national courts to interpret existing exceptions flexibly; ...[+++]whereas technological advances have multiplied and diversified the vectors for creation, production and exploitation of creative works and striking a fair balance of interests between rights holders and users requires new approaches to liberalising access to such works through digital technologies; whereas the Commission is preparing a legislative proposal on orphan works to facilitate the digitisation and dissemination of creative works in Europe,

L . whereas the Directive 2001/29/EC provides for a harmonised legal framework on copyright and related rights and a rigorous, effective system for their protection; whereas Article 5 of the Directive presents an exhaustive enumeration of exceptions and limitations, thereby limiting Member States from providing new exceptions and limitations; whereas ACTA seeks to further extend the level of protection for right holders by catering for more extensive copyright enforcement competencies, but does not address the possibility of expanding existing exceptions and limitations and may constrain discretion of national courts to flexibly interp ...[+++]ret existing exceptions; whereas technological advances have multiplied and diversified the vectors for creation, production and exploitation of creative works and a fair balance of interests between right holders and users requires new approaches to liberalising access to these works through digital technologies; whereas the Commission is preparing a legislative proposal on orphan works to facilitate the digitisation and dissemination of culture works in Europe,

15. Recalls that exceptions from and limitations to copyright are a key aspect of the copyright system and that a notable contribution to economic growth, innovation, and job creation in the EU is generated by institutions relying on such exceptions and limitations; calls on the Commission to propose a harmonised framework for exceptions and limitations in order to address the fragmented market, improve legal security and foster cross-border accessibility of copyright content, to allow equal access to cultural diversity across the EU ...[+++], and to conform to consumer expectations; recalls that when Member States provide for exceptions and limitations, they should ensure that they do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work or subject-matter and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholder; calls for a reassessment of exceptions for research and education purposes, which should cover educational and research activities linked to an educational establishment or institution recognised by national authorities or legislation or within the purview of an educational or research programme; urges the Commission to identify ways in which public and research libraries can lend books to the public in digital formats for personal use, irrespective of place of access and ensuring a fair remuneration for rightholders;