Traduction de «intégration des invalides » (Français → Anglais) :

integration of persons with a disability [ integration of disabled persons | integration of persons with disabilities | integration of disabled | integration of handicapped persons ]

Federal Act of 6 October 2006 on Institutions for the Rehabilitation of Persons on Invalidity Benefit [ RehabIO ]

punch-cancelled [ cut-cancelled | slash-cancelled ]

Invalid Care Allowance | ICA [Abbr.]

Potentially permanent but not disabling damage

Goods for People with Disabilities Regulations Designation Order [ Goods for the Disabled Regulations Designation Order, 1987 | Good for the Disabled Regulations Designation Order ]

application specific integrated circuit | ASIC [Abbr.] | ASICs [Abbr.]

regional economic integration organisation | REIO [Abbr.]

Integrated and Modular Engagement System for the Swiss Soldier

8. Stresses the significance of the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 8 April 2014 declaring invalid Directive 2006/24/EC on Data Retention; recalls that the Court stipulated that the interference of this instrument with the fundamental right to privacy has to be limited to what is strictly necessary; highlights the fact that this ruling presents a novel aspect insofar as the Court of Justice refers specifically to a particular body of case law of the European Court of Human Rights concerning the issue of ‘general programmes of surveillance’ and has now effectively incorporated the same principles, stemming ...[+++] from that particular case law of the European Court of Human Rights, into EU law in this same field; stresses that it is therefore to be expected that the Court of Justice will, in future, also apply the same reasoning when assessing the validity, under the Charter, of other EU and Member State legislative acts in this same field of ‘general programmes of surveillance’;

8. Stresses the significance of the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 8 April 2014 declaring invalid Directive 2006/24/EC on Data Retention; recalls that the Court stipulated that the interference of this instrument with the fundamental right to privacy has to be limited to what is strictly necessary; highlights the fact that this ruling presents a novel aspect insofar as the Court of Justice refers specifically to a particular body of case law of the European Court of Human Rights concerning the issue of ‘general programmes of surveillance’ and has now effectively incorporated the same principles, stemming ...[+++] from that particular case law of the European Court of Human Rights, into EU law in this same field; stresses that it is therefore to be expected that the Court of Justice will, in future, also apply the same reasoning when assessing the validity, under the Charter, of other EU and Member State legislative acts in this same field of ‘general programmes of surveillance’;

I believe in gender mainstreaming, but it should apply to disabled people too, with disabled, not able-bodied, people representing them.

8. Points out that the CCEE will probably have great difficulty co-financing the Sapard programme as they will have to incorporate the budget resources originally set aside for 2000 and 2001 as an additional factor in their budgets for 2002, 2003 and later; calls therefore on the Commission to take appropriate measures to ensure that Sapard funds are not forfeited as a result of the late implementation of the programme;