Traduction de «lesquelles la commission aurait méconnu » (Français → Anglais) :

investigate the alleged failure of the Commission to comply with the obligation imposed by Article 14(3) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 to keep under review the test cycles used to measure emissions and to adapt them, if they are no longer adequate or no longer reflect real world emissions, so as to adequately reflect the emissions generated by real driving on the road, despite information relating to serious and persistent exceedances of the emissions limit values for vehicles in normal use, in contravention of the obligations set ou ...[+++]t in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007, including the Commission’s Joint Research Centre’s reports of 2011 and 2013 and research by the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) made available in May 2014;

investigate the alleged failure of the Commission to comply with the obligation imposed by Article 14(3) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 to keep under review the test cycles used to measure emissions and to adapt them, if they are no longer adequate or no longer reflect real world emissions, so as to adequately reflect the emissions generated by real driving on the road, despite information relating to serious and persistent exceedances of the emissions limit values for vehicles in normal use, in contravention of the obligations set ou ...[+++]t in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007, including the Commission’s Joint Research Centre’s reports of 2011 and 2013 and research by the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) made available in May 2014;

– investigate the alleged failure of the Commission to comply with the obligation imposed by Article 14(3) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 to keep under review the test cycles used to measure emissions and to adapt them if they are no longer adequate or no longer reflect real world emissions so as to adequately reflect the emissions generated by real driving on the road, despite information related to serious and persistent exceedances of the emissions limit values for vehicles in normal use, in contravention of the obligations set out ...[+++] in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007, including the Commission’s Joint Research Centre’s reports of 2011 and 2013 and research by the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) made available in May 2014;

GUK requested that I suspend the deadline for its reply to the LF until I had taken a decision on their claims that the Commission should have issued a Supplementary Statement of Objections (‘SSO’) in relation to some of the evidence put forward in the LF and a new LF clarifying the intended use of some of the evidence (see Section IV.4. below).

As opposed to the 2000, 2002 and 2003 agreements with Ryanair, for which the Commission accepted that no meaningful regression can be run on the basis of ex ante cost data and therefore, cost data for the period 1998 - 2008 was used as proxy to what a reasonable MEO would have expected at the time those agreements were concluded (see recital 491), in the case of the 2007 agreement with Germanwings and the 2010 agreement with Meridiana more data points are available to conduct the regression on ex ante cost data, which would have been available to So.Ge.A.AL at the time it entered into the agreements in question.

Nor has the Commission found any indication that TV2 failed to comply with its obligations or that its performance was such that its activities could no longer be considered an SGEI under Article 106(2) TFEU.

By its second plea, put forward by way of alternative submission, the applicant submits that the Commission erred in law by misconstruing the notion of 'undertaking' within the meaning of Article 81 EC and, as a result, imposing on it a fine calculated on the basis of the consolidated turnover of Groupe Gascogne, whereas, according to the applicant, it ought to have based itself on the aggregate corporate turnover of Groupe Gascogne and Sachsa, having failed to set out reasons as to why the other subsidiaries of Groupe Gascogne ought to be included within ‘the undertaking’ liable in respect of the practices of Sachsa adjudged anti-compet ...[+++]itive in the contested decision.

The Council should have given its backing to attempts to flesh out somewhat the details of how its own decisions are to be monitored and interpreted, and the Commission should have supported such attempts accordingly.

The rules should also include arrangements for the Commission to make financial corrections if a Member State does not take adequate steps to comply with its obligations.

The current situation, where a legislative text is approved by Council and then ignored by some Member States, who may often fail to send in the reports on which the Commission must base its assessment of the state of compliance, is no longer acceptable, - nor should it ever have been tolerated.