Traduction de «traitement des différences de change » (Français → Anglais) :

treatment of exchange differences

realized exchange gain/loss [ realized exchange gains or losses ]

exchange gain or loss | exchange difference | foreign currency transaction gain or loss | foreign exchange gain or loss

realized exchange gains or losses | realized translation gains or losses

off-line operation [ off-line processing | off-line working ]

currency difference

adjustments in respect of exchange differences

exchange difference

exchange adjustment | exchange difference

Definition: A disorder characterized by repeated episodes of depression as described for depressive episode (F32.-), without any history of independent episodes of mood elevation and increased energy (mania). There may, however, be brief episodes of mild mood elevation and overactivity (hypomania) immediately after a depressive episode, sometimes precipitated by antidepressant treatment. The more severe forms of recurrent depressive disorder (F33.2 and F33.3) have much in common with earlier concepts such as manic-depressive depression, melancholia, vital depression and endogenous depression. The first episode may occur at any age from c ...[+++]hildhood to old age, the onset may be either acute or insidious, and the duration varies from a few weeks to many months. The risk that a patient with recurrent depressive disorder will have an episode of mania never disappears completely, however many depressive episodes have been experienced. If such an episode does occur, the diagnosis should be changed to bipolar affective disorder (F31.-). | recurrent episodes of:depressive reaction | psychogenic depression | reactive depression | seasonal depressive disorder

The question of similarity needs to be distinguished from the difference in treatment: A difference in treatment only exists in relation to imported electricity that would have been eligible under the EEG-Act 2012 if it had been produced in Germany.

If it is owned by an American company, I guarantee you that they will be before the dispute resolution mechanism claiming this is not national treatment, it's discriminatory treatment, because the previous four pulp mills, which may well be Canadian, have had to respond to different standards.

That has led to differential tax treatment, and that has even led Department of Justice lawyers to argue that we should disregard the civil law because it leads to different results when the Income Tax Act is applied in Quebec.

(Return tabled) Question No. 27 Mr. Todd Russell: With respect to tax treatments offered to the fishermen from Atlantic Canada and Quebec: (a) were the fishermen who accepted the Atlantic Fisheries Groundfish Retirement Package and who permanently gave up their fishing licences in the years 1999 and 2000 advised in writing by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans to report, at the time of filing their income tax, that the retirement lump-sum payment was to be counted as revenue from a capital gain and, if so, (i) why, (ii) why did the Department of Fisheries and Oceans issue this advice, (iii) how many fishermen did the Department of Fi ...[+++]sheries and Oceans give that advice to; (b) why did Revenue Canada or the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency agree to give certain other fishermen a different tax treatment than the one outlined above, for the same retirement years; (c) how many fishermen received that different tax treatment; (d) why did the Minister of National Revenue and the Federal Minister of Fisheries advise these former fishermen (or their survivors in the case of deceased former fishermen) to appeal to the Regional Director of Taxation in St. John’s for a review; (e) has the Regional Director of Taxation informed the affected individuals that he will not accept their appeals and, if so, why; and (f) did Revenue Canada or the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency reach an out-of-court settlement in 2007 with a certain number of fishermen who had appealed their tax treatment and, if so, (i) why, (ii) why were the fishermen involved in that out-of-court settlement required to sign a secrecy or non-disclosure document, (iii) how many fishermen were involved in that out-of-court settlement?