Traduction de «traitement en différé » (Français → Anglais) :

off-line operation | off-line processing

off-line operation [ off-line processing | off-line working ]

treatment of exchange differences

to opt for a different tax treatment

difference processing

gender-sensitive educational system

batch processing | deferred processing

batch processing | off-line processing

heat treating operator | process engineer, metallurgical | heat treat technician | plastic heat treatment equipment operator

pure endowment insurance | pure endowment | pure endowment assurance

The question of similarity needs to be distinguished from the difference in treatment: A difference in treatment only exists in relation to imported electricity that would have been eligible under the EEG-Act 2012 if it had been produced in Germany.

If it is owned by an American company, I guarantee you that they will be before the dispute resolution mechanism claiming this is not national treatment, it's discriminatory treatment, because the previous four pulp mills, which may well be Canadian, have had to respond to different standards.

That has led to differential tax treatment, and that has even led Department of Justice lawyers to argue that we should disregard the civil law because it leads to different results when the Income Tax Act is applied in Quebec.

(Return tabled) Question No. 27 Mr. Todd Russell: With respect to tax treatments offered to the fishermen from Atlantic Canada and Quebec: (a) were the fishermen who accepted the Atlantic Fisheries Groundfish Retirement Package and who permanently gave up their fishing licences in the years 1999 and 2000 advised in writing by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans to report, at the time of filing their income tax, that the retirement lump-sum payment was to be counted as revenue from a capital gain and, if so, (i) why, (ii) why did the Department of Fisheries and Oceans issue this advice, (iii) how many fishermen did the Department of Fi ...[+++]sheries and Oceans give that advice to; (b) why did Revenue Canada or the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency agree to give certain other fishermen a different tax treatment than the one outlined above, for the same retirement years; (c) how many fishermen received that different tax treatment; (d) why did the Minister of National Revenue and the Federal Minister of Fisheries advise these former fishermen (or their survivors in the case of deceased former fishermen) to appeal to the Regional Director of Taxation in St. John’s for a review; (e) has the Regional Director of Taxation informed the affected individuals that he will not accept their appeals and, if so, why; and (f) did Revenue Canada or the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency reach an out-of-court settlement in 2007 with a certain number of fishermen who had appealed their tax treatment and, if so, (i) why, (ii) why were the fishermen involved in that out-of-court settlement required to sign a secrecy or non-disclosure document, (iii) how many fishermen were involved in that out-of-court settlement?