Traduction de «Ricorso antidumping » (Italien → Anglais) :

anti-dumping legislation [ anti-dumping code | anti-dumping proceeding ]

appeal to the Court (EU) [ action brought before a Community court | action brought before the EC Court of Justice | appeal to the European Court of Justice ]

action brought before an administrative court [ full review of the merits of a decision ]

subsidiary constitutional appeal | constitutional appeal

appeal decision

Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office | EPO Board of Appeal

statement of grounds of the appeal | written statement setting out the grounds of appeal

Board of Appeal | Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) | OHIM Board of Appeal

Federal Appeals Commission for the List of Pharmaceutical Specialities [ ACLS ]

anti-dumping legislation | anti-dumping regulation | anti-dumping law | anti-dumping statutes

It notes, nevertheless, that progress remains to be made, particularly on the administration and supervision of anti-dumping measures, including the use of existing databases, and on keeping separate accounts for customs debts, as the Court mentions in its report.

They added that the General Court’s ruling ‘Acron’ quoted in the disclosure document (9) is based on a wrong interpretation of Article 2.2.1.1 of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement (ADA), it is currently being appealed before the Court of Justice and in any event the factual considerations are different from those in the present case, since raw material prices in Argentina are not ‘regulated’ as it is the gas price in Russia and are not distorted but determined freely without any State intervention and therefore there is not a particular market situation in Argentina that would allow the Commission to apply Article 2(5) of the basic Regulati ...[+++]on.

Calls on the EU, in the event of China engaging in illegal trade practices, to make wherever use necessary of such trade defence instruments as are consistent with WTO rules, such as anti-dumping, anti-subsidy and safeguard measures, and to also make greater use of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism in order to ensure a level playing field for EU-China trade; is concerned by China’s increasing use of anti-dumping measures targeting EU exports as well as price dumping measures and state subsidies; invites, therefore, China to ensure that its anti-dumping measures are consistent with WTO rules;

In support of its action, the applicant claims that its application for a refund of anti-dumping duties, which was refused by the Commission's decision of 13 December 2011, was, contrary to the Commission's view, not lodged out of time and was therefore admissible.