Traduction de «comportamento di allontanamento » (Italien → Anglais) :

avoidance reaction | avoiding reaction

avoidance reaction | avoiding reaction

order removal | issue a removal order

voting behaviour | voter behaviour | electoral behaviour

legally binding removal order

departure from nucleate boiling performance | DNB performance

check out customer traits | monitor customers' behaviour | monitor customer behaviour | observe clients' needs and attitude

behavioural sciences [ behavioural psychology | behaviourism ]

adolescent socialisation behaviours | adolescent socialisation conduct | adolescent socialisation behaviour | adolescent socialisation comportment

control passenger behaviour during emergencies | manage passenger behaviour during emergency situations | help to control passenger behaviour during emergency situations | perform emergency passenger management procedures

The Advocate General concludes therefore that a Union citizen cannot rely on the right to enhanced protection against expulsion provided for by the directive where it is shown that he is deriving that right from criminal conduct constituting a serious disturbance of the public policy of the host Member State.

Furthermore, the fact of having concealed, by threats or duress, criminal conduct constituting a serious disturbance of public policy can deprive the perpetrator of the protection against expulsion resulting from a prolonged stay in the host Member State

3. Recalls that Directive 2004/38 circumscribes the possibility of expelling a Union citizen within very clearly defined limits, notably the fact of being a threat to public order or public security or of being an unreasonable burden on the social assistance system; expulsions decisions have to be assessed and decided individually, taking into consideration the personal circumstances (Article 28), procedural safeguards have to be applied (Article 30), access to judicial and administrative suspension and redress procedures shall be guaranteed (Article 31), expulsions of citizens on grounds of representing an unreasonable burden on the host Member State's social assistance system is not sufficient in itself to justify automatic expulsion (re ...[+++]cital 16 and Article 14), any restriction of freedom of movement and residence based on grounds of public policy, public security or public health cannot be invoked to serve economic ends, shall be proportional and be based solely on the personal conduct of the individual concerned and not on considerations of general prevention and the personal conduct of the individual concerned must represent a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society (Article 27), sanctions laid down by Member States must be effective and proportionate (Article 36) and persons have to be given at least one month to leave;

3. Recalls that Directive 2004/38 circumscribes the possibility of expelling a Union citizen within very clearly defined limits and that, specifically, expulsions decisions have to be assessed and decided individually, taking into consideration the personal circumstances (Article 28), procedural safeguards have to be applied (Article 30), access to judicial and administrative suspension and redress procedures shall be guaranteed (Article 31), expulsions of citizens on grounds of representing an unreasonable burden on the host Member State’s social assistance system is not sufficient in itself to justify automatic expulsion (recital 16 and Article 14), any restriction of freedom of movement and residence based on grounds of public policy, pu ...[+++]blic security or public health cannot be invoked to serve economic ends, shall be proportional and be based solely on the personal conduct of the individual concerned and on no account on considerations of general prevention (Article 27), sanctions laid down by Member States must be effective and proportionate (Article 36);