Traduction de «dipendenza dal gioco d'azzardo » (Italien → Anglais) :

gambling addiction [ compulsive gambling | excessive gambling | gambling dependency | pathological gambling | problem gambling ]

compulsive gambling | gambling addiction | gambling disorder | pathological gambling

automatic game [ automatic gaming machine | gambling machine | gaming machine | one-armed bandit | slot machine ]

gross gaming revenue | GGR [Abbr.]

game of chance [ bingo | lottery | tombola ]

conduct reviews of gamblers' profiles | manage gambler's game | manage gambling game | manage game of gambling

manage gambling online | manage online gambles | manage online gambling | monitor gambling website

gambling online | online gamble | internet gambling | online gambling

Following the 2012 Communication on online gambling, the Commission has launched a series of initiatives, including, for example, recommendations on consumer protection and advertising in the online gambling sector, has encouraged enhanced administrative cooperation and has started an Expert Group on Gambling Services for EEA gambling regulators to exchange good practice, facilitate administrative cooperation and improve trust.

The Commission considers that complaints in the gambling sector can be handled more efficiently by national courts also in the light of the numerous judgements of the Court of Justice of the EU on national gambling legislation.

In its Resolution of 10 September 2013 on online gambling in the internal market, the European Parliament (3) called on the Commission to explore the possibility of interoperability between national self-exclusion registers, to raise awareness about the risks of gambling addiction and to consider compulsory third-party identification checks.

Does the principle of proportionality laid down in Article 56 TFEU and in Articles 15 to 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights preclude national legislation like the relevant provisions in the main proceedings, Paragraphs 3 to 5 and Paragraphs 14 and 21 of the GSpG, which permits the organisation of games of chance using machines only on the condition — which may be enforced by both criminal penalties and direct intervention — of the prior issue of a licence, which is available only in limited numbers, even though — as far as can be seen — the State has not shown thus far in a single judicial or administrative procedure that associated crime and/or addiction to gam ...[+++]bling actually constitute a significant problem which cannot be remedied by a controlled expansion of authorised gaming activities to a large number of individual providers, but only by a controlled expansion, coupled with only moderate advertising, by one monopoly holder (or a small number of oligopolists)?