Traduction de «obiettivo per paese » (Italien → Anglais) :

31. Welcomes the Law on protection of the family and prevention of violence against women; commends the National Action Plan to combat Violence against Women (2012-2015) and stresses the need to enforce it effectively nationwide; calls on the Ministry for Family and Social Policies to continue its efforts to increase the number and quality of shelters for women and minors in danger; stresses the importance of providing women who have been victims of violence with concrete alternatives and self-sustainment prospects; commends Turkey’s efforts, at all levels, to fight against ‘honour killings’, domestic violence and the phenomenon of forced marriages and child brides, and underlines the importance of a zero-tolerance attitude towards viol ...[+++]ence against women, and the importance of continuously stepping up prevention measures; is concerned, however, by the fact that, despite such efforts, violence against women is still a regular occurrence, and asks that those who fail to protect and assist victims be identified and prosecuted; stresses the importance of tackling poverty amongst women and of increasing the social inclusion of women; calls on the Ministry to continue actively to promote women’s rights, education – including by bridging the gender gap in secondary education – and participation in the labour market (which remains low), in politics and at senior level in the public as well as private sector, if necessary by introducing reserved quotas and by reviewing certain specific laws regulating employment in Turkey; encourages the Government of Turkey to revise the law on political parties and the law on elections in order to make the inclusion of women a priority for political parties; notes that Turkey’s 2023 employment target for women is 35 %, while in the EU 2020 strategy the target is 75 %; encourages Turkey to strive to achieve an ambitious employment target for women;

All the other debates about the long-term building-up of the country also need to be held, of course, but I do not think that there is really any point in us putting forward a catalogue of demands clean across all political areas – from the freedom of the media to women’s rights – here in Parliament at this point, or that we will be taken seriously if we do so. Doing so will not achieve our goal in Yemen, so instead, we should concentrate on what tangible assistance we can provide in the current situation in order to solve an urgent problem.

All the other debates about the long-term building-up of the country also need to be held, of course, but I do not think that there is really any point in us putting forward a catalogue of demands clean across all political areas – from the freedom of the media to women’s rights – here in Parliament at this point, or that we will be taken seriously if we do so. Doing so will not achieve our goal in Yemen, so instead, we should concentrate on what tangible assistance we can provide in the current situation in order to solve an urgent problem.

2. Takes the view that in its draft Strategy Paper and draft Multi-Annual Indicative Programme 2007-2010 for Malaysia the European Commission exceeds its implementing powers laid down in the basic act by selecting as the only focal sector (for which 100% of the funds are earmarked) ‘EU-Malaysia Policy Dialogue Facility on Trade and Investment’, ‘the overall objective of which is to facilitate trade and investment relations between the EU and Malaysia’ and by including two specific objectives for the actions, namely ‘to increase EU mar ...[+++]ket knowledge for the Malaysian business community and vice versa’ and ‘to raise the EU visibility in Malaysia through joint initiatives’; considers that these elements are not in compliance with Article 2(1) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006, as the primary objective of the Country Strategy Paper is not the eradication of poverty, and as these elements do not fulfil the criteria for ODA established by the OECD/DAC;

The aim of the Directive is to enable this interest paid in one EU country to individual residents for tax purposes in another country (beneficial owners), to be made subject to effective taxation in accordance with the laws of the country.

Good examples are found in Germany, the Objective 2 Programmes of Bavaria, North Rhine-Westphalia and Lower Saxony, and the Objective 1 Programmes of Berlin, Brandenburg and Saxony-Anhalt; in the United Kingdom, the Objective 2 Programmes of North West England and Yorkshire Humber, and the Objective 1 Programmes of South Yorkshire and West Wales and the East Finland Objective 1 Programme.