Traduction de «Shipment documentation » (Anglais → Français) :

handling shipment documentation | shipment documentation handling | handle a shipment document | handle shipment documentation

compare contents of shipment with waybill | ensure shipping record information accurately reflects shipment contents | compare shipment contents with waybill | compare shipment with waybill

apply shipment packing requirements | receive information on shipment packaging requirements | interpret shipment packaging information | receive shipment packaging information

advice of loading | advice of shipment | loading advice | notice of loading | notice of shipment | shipment advice

products covered by a single transport document covering their shipment from the exporter to the consignee

crossborder commercial shipment [ cross-border commercial shipment | transborder commercial shipment ]

illegal shipment | illegal shipment of waste

Mexico Deemed Direct Shipment (General Preferential Tariff) Regulations [ Mexico Direct Shipment Condition Exemption Order ]

lot shipment | multi-piece shipment

18. For the purposes of subsection 11(2) of the Act, a label of a bulk shipment is included with or accompanies the bulk shipment when it is included with the shipping documents that accompany the bulk shipment.

(Return tabled) Question No. 129 Mr. Alex Atamanenko: With regard to the horse slaughter industry in Canada: (a) what is the government’s policy on requiring medical history on equine identity documents (EID) only for the last six months of a horse’s life, and not for an entire lifespan; (b) does the government have information on what happened to the meat from the racehorse Backstreet Bully, who had been administered several courses of a variety of banned medications throughout its lifetime, prior to being sold into the slaughter pipeline, and what are the details of Backstreet Bully’s EID and all other traceability documents and recor ...[+++]ds; (c) does the government have information on what happened to the meat from the racehorse Silky Shark, who had been administered the drug phenylbutazone prior to being sold into the slaughter pipeline, and what are the details of Silky Shark’s EID and all other traceability documents and records; (d) what system is in place for owners to report the history of banned drugs they have administered to a horse that they previously owned, when they discover that a subsequent owner has sold that horse into the slaughter pipeline; (e) when such instances as mentioned in (d) are reported, and it is found that the meat was sold as human food, what system is in place to recall that meat from domestic and international retailers, (i) how many such instances have been reported, (ii) what were the results of the government’s investigations into these reports; (f) how does the government keep count of the number of horses being imported from the United States (U.S) for slaughter; (g) how does the government explain the discrepancy between the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA)/Agriculture Canada and U.S. Department of Agriculture figures; (h) what were the findings of the government’s investigation into the large numbers of emaciated horses arriving from the U.S. in 2011 destined for Les Viandes de la Petite-Nation slaughter plant, and ...

Article 17(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on shipments of waste, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 669/2008 of 15 July 2008, must be interpreted as meaning that the shipment of waste, such as that referred to in Annex IV to that regulation, in the country of transit at a different border crossing point than that which is provided in the notification document and which the competent authorities consented to, must be considered to be an essential change made to ...[+++]the details and/or conditions of the shipment which received consent, so that the fact of not having informed the competent authorities of that change results in the shipment of waste being illegal because it was ‘effected in a way which is not specified materially in the notification’ within the meaning of Article 2(35)(d) of that regulation.

In very short order, the difference between Canada and the United States right now is simply that the United States does have a process at the border to question, stop, and scrutinize any kind of trademarked product, whereas in Canada, as long as the goods are described appropriately, as I said earlier in my example of the Canada Goose jackets, as long as the documentation that accompanies the shipment declares them as winter jackets, there's nothing in Canada that can be done currently. In the United States the minute anything is trademarked, a shipment ...[+++]needs to declare, on the documentation, without even opening a box, that it is trademarked goods, and that they have the permission of the trademark owner to import those goods.