Traduction de «frequent claimant » (Anglais → Français) :

frequent claimant [ frequent user | regular user ]

frequent guest program | frequent guest programme | frequent stay program | frequent-stay program | frequent stay programme | frequent-stay programme | frequent lodger program | frequent lodger programme

refugee claimant [ refugee protection claimant | refugee status claimant | claimant of refugee protection | claimant to refugee status | person who claims refugee protection | person who has claimed refugee protection ]

employment insurance claimant [ EI claimant | claimant | unemployment insurance claimant | UI claimant ]

Frequently Asked Question | FAQ | frequently asked question | Frequent Asked Question

A rare idiopathic skin disease with characteristics of widespread, congenital, superficial erosions and vesicles (often involving more than 75% of the body) which heal leaving scars with a supple, symmetrical, reticulated pattern, frequently resultin

A rare epilepsy syndrome characterized by late-onset (after 1 year old) epileptic spasms that occur in clusters, associated with tonic seizures, atypical absences and cognitive deterioration. Language difficulties and behavior problems are frequently

A rare inborn error of metabolism disorder with early-onset acute encephalopathic episodes (frequently triggered by viral infections) associated with lactic acidosis and alpha-ketoglutaric aciduria which typically manifest with variable degrees of at

Definition: An acute psychotic disorder in which hallucinations, delusions or perceptual disturbances are obvious but markedly variable, changing from day to day or even from hour to hour. Emotional turmoil with intense transient feelings of happiness or ecstasy, or anxiety and irritability, is also frequently present. The polymorphism and instability are characteristic for the overall clinical picture and the psychotic features do not justify a diagnosis of schizophrenia (F20.-). These disorders often have an abrupt onset, developing rapidly within a few days, and they frequently show a rapid resolution of symptoms with no recurrence. I ...[+++]f the symptoms persist the diagnosis should be changed to persistent delusional disorder (F22.-). | Bouffée délirante without symptoms of schizophrenia or unspecified Cycloid psychosis without symptoms of schizophrenia or unspecified

frequently asked questions | FAQ | frequently asked questions file | FAQ file

(Return tabled) Question No. 38 Ms. Judy Foote: With regard to changes in employment insurance (EI), in each province and economic region, broken down by age (18-24, 25-54, 55 and over), and for the time period between January and June, broken down by month and totaled for each year since 2004: (a) how many unemployed Canadians (i) applied for EI, (ii) received EI, (iii) how many applicants were rejected; (b) what was the cost to process these applications; (c) what were the total costs of these benefits; (d) how many in receipt of EI benefits in 2013 have previously received EI (i) one time, (ii) two times, (iii) three times or more; (e) how many claimants with three or more claims totaling more than sixty weeks in the past five years ...[+++]have had to accept a job that paid thirty percent less than their last job; (f) how many claimants worked while on EI; (g) how many total applicants have dependents, and how many of these applicants were rejected; (h) of the three new classes created, how many applicants fall under (i) long tenured workers, (ii) frequent claimants, (iii) occasional claimants; and (i) how many applicants live (i) in rural areas, (ii) in urban areas?

In determining what criteria apply, EI claimants will be placed in one of three categories: long-tenured workers, frequent claimants and occasional claimants.

Why is the government creating three categories of recipients: frequent claimants, long-tenured workers and occasional claimants?

This gives rise to a great deal of legal uncertainty .[3] These particularities include the very complex factual and economic analysis required, the frequent inaccessibility and concealment of crucial evidence in the hands of defendants and the often unfavourable risk/reward balance for claimants.