Traduction de «Examen réglementaire » (Français → Anglais) :

regulatory review

regulatory review in the licensing process

regulatory review

Regulatory Review of Pharmaceuticals, Biologics, and Medical Devices: 2004 Annual Summary of Performance

Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations [ REGS | Standing Joint Committee on Scrutiny of Regulations | Standing Joint Committee on Regulations and other Statutory Instruments | Standing Joint Committee for Regulatory Scrutiny | Special Committee on Statutory Instruments ]

regulatory review process | regulatory process

regulatory policy [ better lawmaking | better law-making | better regulation | good regulatory practice | outcome-based regulation | performance-based regulation | REFIT | regulatory fitness | Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme | regulatory governance | regulatory improvement | regulatory quality | regulatory reform | smart regulation ]

Regulatory documentation

regulation [ regulatory provision ]

admission to examinations [ conditions of admission to examinations ]

The envisaged requirements shall not be adopted during a period of two months from the receipt of complete information by the Commission unless otherwise agreed between the Commission and the national regulatory authority, or the Commission has informed the national regulatory authority of a shortened examination period, or the Commission has made comments or recommendations.

8. Points out that in the recently adopted Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) the time period for scrutinising RTS may be extended by a further month given their volume and complexity, and considers that this kind of flexibility should become a general rule; considers that deadlines for objections by Parliament to delegated acts adopted by the Commission need to be sufficiently long to allow for the full exercise of Parliament’s rights of scrutiny, taking into account the plenary calendar and workload; takes the view that the standard deadline of two months, extendable by two months, as provi ...[+++]ded for the in the Common Understanding is not sufficiently long for complex matters and extensive delegated acts, which call for a longer scrutiny period to be set; recalls that the co-legislator has full discretion regarding the period of scrutiny to be set in the basic act; stresses, in this regard, that where the Common Understanding provides guidelines in relation to deadlines, it is in no way binding and therefore does not limit the legislator in this respect; points out that the legislator has set a period of scrutiny of three months, extendable by three months, for all delegated acts in the area of financial services, and considers that this practice should be extended to other areas of a complex nature;

The structure should provide a framework for national regulators to cooperate, a regulatory review of the cooperation between transmission operators and scope for taking individual decisions concerning infrastructure in the territory of more than one Member State.

The content of the reports should include relevant information with regard to the monitoring of safety performance, compliance with applicable safety regulatory requirements by supervised organisations, the programme of safety regulatory audits, the review of the safety arguments, changes to functional systems implemented by supervised organisations in accordance with procedures accepted by the competent authority and safety directives issued by such authority.