Traduction de «Mouvement secondaire irrégulier » (Français → Anglais) :

9. Calls for an urgent review of the Dublin Regulation by establishing a permanent EU-wide legally binding system of distribution of asylum seekers between the Member States, based on fair, compulsory allocation, while taking into account the needs and preferences of asylum seekers themselves; suggests that a system under which asylum seekers could apply for asylum in a Member State where they already have family ties, community links or better employment prospects would significantly improve their integration prospects; considers also that such a system would significantly reduce irregular secondary movements within th ...[+++]e EU and the need for coercive measures such as the detention of asylum seekers for the purpose of transferring them back to the Member State responsible; calls on the Commission, furthermore, to put forward proposals to allow the mutual recognition of positive asylum decisions, the transfer of international protection status within the EU and the creation of the Common European Asylum Service; urges the Member States, in the meantime, to apply the provisions in the Dublin Regulation without restrictive interpretation, in accordance with the principle of solidarity and fundamental rights, such as those relating to unaccompanied children, family reunification and discretionary clauses; welcomes the fact that Germany is applying the Dublin Regulation’s sovereignty clause to Syrian refugees so that they can stay in Germany instead of being sent back to the Member State of arrival; encourages other Member States to follow this example;

22. Takes note of the scheduled review of the functioning of the Dublin Regulation in 2016 and of the announcement of the Commissioner for Migration and Home Affairs that the Dublin system will be reviewed already this year; calls on the Commission to explore alternatives to the current Dublin system which would be fairer to both Member States and asylum seekers; suggests that a system under which asylum seekers could apply for asylum in a Member State where they already have family ties, community links or better employment prospects would significantly improve their integration prospects; in addition, such a system would significantly reduce irregular secondary ...[+++] movements within the EU, as well as the need for coercive measures such as detention of asylum seekers for the purpose of transferring them back to the Member State responsible; suggests further that a distribution key could be used to develop a fair allocation of funding among Member States and to allocate asylum seekers who have no strong reasons for preferring one or another Member State; furthermore, calls on the Commission to put forward proposals to allow the mutual recognition of positive asylum decisions and the transfer of international protection status within the EU;

UNHCR envisages that these new arrangements, in the form of multi-lateral “special arrangements” could consist of comprehensive plans of action to ensure more effective and predictable responses to large-scale refugee situations, including additional development assistance targeted to achieve more equitable burden sharing and to promote the self reliance of refugees and returnees in countries hosting large numbers of refugees; multilateral commitments for the resettlement of refugees; and the agreement of roles and responsibilities of countries of origin, transit and destination in irregular secondary movement situation ...[+++]s.

18. Participating Member States at the Seminar viewed the idea of an EU wide Resettlement Scheme, if strategically used as part of a comprehensive approach, as a potentially very useful policy tool enabling i) comprehensive solutions to refugee situations, in particular to those of a protracted nature, ii) the creation and enhancement of protection capacities of the regions of origin, and iii) an alternative to irregular secondary movements of those persons who cannot find effective protection in the country of first asylum, as well as the criminal activities linked to such movements.

18. Participating Member States at the Seminar viewed the idea of an EU wide Resettlement Scheme, if strategically used as part of a comprehensive approach, as a potentially very useful policy tool enabling i) comprehensive solutions to refugee situations, in particular to those of a protracted nature, ii) the creation and enhancement of protection capacities of the regions of origin, and iii) an alternative to irregular secondary movements of those persons who cannot find effective protection in the country of first asylum, as well as the criminal activities linked to such movements.

UNHCR envisages that these new arrangements, in the form of multi-lateral "special arrangements" could consist of comprehensive plans of action to ensure more effective and predictable responses to large-scale refugee situations, including additional development assistance targeted to achieve more equitable burden sharing and to promote the self reliance of refugees and returnees in countries hosting large numbers of refugees; multilateral commitments for the resettlement of refugees; and the agreement of roles and responsibilities of countries of origin, transit and destination in irregular secondary movement situation ...[+++]s.