Traduction de «Réponse et défense complètes » (Français → Anglais) :

to adduce full defence

complete defence

Reply and Defence to Counterclaim

answer to counterpetition | reply to answer to counter-petition | reply to defence to counterclaim

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include sel ...[+++]f-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptoms, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

complete histological response

Another one is called the “full answer in defence” exception, and this can arise when adherence to the rule would have the effect of preventing an accused person from making full answer in defence.

Part of the answer lies in occupational and personal pension schemes complementing state-based pensions.

You will continue to have a challenge to not having full answer and defence, not having the person accused get access to all the evidence that is put before him or her.

I would submit that if the legal standard were not so low, and if there really were full answer and defence, if we really got all the evidence, they would not necessarily, because they would not be able to legally rationalize absurd concoctions of new allegations.