Traduction de «Système du premier déposant » (Français → Anglais) :

first-tofile system

first-to-file rule [ first to file rule ]

first to file patent system

first applicant

first generation | 1G | first generation wireless technology | 1G wireless technology | first generation technology | 1G technology | first generation wireless system | 1G wireless system | first generation wireless | 1G wireless | first generation system | 1G system

mission critical system | mission-critical system | vital system

Definition: Symptoms are presented by the patient as if they were due to a physical disorder of a system or organ that is largely or completely under autonomic innervation and control, i.e. the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, respiratory and urogenital systems. The symptoms are usually of two types, neither of which indicates a physical disorder of the organ or system concerned. First, there are complaints based upon objective signs of autonomic arousal, such as palpitations, sweating, flushing, tremor, and expression of fear and di ...[+++]stress about the possibility of a physical disorder. Second, there are subjective complaints of a nonspecific or changing nature such as fleeting aches and pains, sensations of burning, heaviness, tightness, and feelings of being bloated or distended, which are referred by the patient to a specific organ or system. | Cardiac neurosis Da Costa's syndrome Gastric neurosis Neurocirculatory asthenia Psychogenic forms of:aerophagy | cough | diarrhoea | dyspepsia | dysuria | flatulence | hiccough | hyperventilation | increased frequency of micturition | irritable bowel syndrome | pylorospasm

last in, first out | last in, first out method | LIFO [Abbr.]

first come, first served | greyhound system | FCFS [Abbr.]

Historically, there were first-to-file or first-to-invent processes, and they were different in different countries.

The thing about the U.S. system, and Stuart and Glen will know this much better than I do, is that it's the difference between first to file and first to invent.

4. Stresses that first-pillar, public pension schemes remain the most important source of income for pensioners; regrets that in the White Paper the Commission does not properly address the importance of universal, at least poverty-proof, first-pillar public schemes; calls on the Member States – in line with the Europe 2020 strategy’s targets on raising employment and combating poverty – to continue to work on more active and inclusive labour market strategies to decrease the economic dependency ratio between inactive persons and people in employment; calls on the social partners and the Member States to combine these reforms with constant improvements in working conditions and the implementation of lifelong training schemes which enable ...[+++] people to have healthier and longer careers until the statutory retirement age, thereby increasing the number of people paying pension premiums, this also to avoid increasing public pension costs jeopardising sustainable public finances; calls on Member States to implement reforms to their first-pillar systems in such a way that the number of contributory years is also taken into account;

Such schemes guarantee protection for depositors beyond that provided by a Deposit Guarantee Scheme.