Traduction de «catégorie de signalement » (Français → Anglais) :

class-of-service tone

calling party's category signal

Definition: A residual category for disorders in which there is some admixture of specific developmental disorders of speech and language, of scholastic skills, and of motor function, but in which none predominates sufficiently to constitute the prime diagnosis. This mixed category should be used only when there is a major overlap between each of these specific developmental disorders. The disorders are usually, but not always, associated with some degree of general impairment of cognitive functions. Thus, the category should be used ...[+++]when there are dysfunctions meeting the criteria for two or more of F80.-, F81.- and F82.

enhanced category 5 cable | category 5e cable | category 5e cabling | category 5+ cable | category 5+ cabling | enhanced cat 5 | category 5e | category 5+ | cat 5e | cat 5+

Definition: This category should be used to record the presence of psychological or behavioural influences thought to have played a major part in the etiology of physical disorders which can be classified to other chapters. Any resulting mental disturbances are usually mild, and often prolonged (such as worry, emotional conflict, apprehension) and do not of themselves justify the use of any of the categories in this chapter. | Psychological factors affecting physical conditions Examples of the use of this category are:asthma F54 and J45.- | dermatitis F54 and L23-L25 | gastric ulcer F54 and K25.- | mucous colitis F54 and K58.- | ulcerati ...[+++]ve colitis F54 and K51.- | urticaria F54 and L50.-

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

bequest to a class | class bequest

object class | facility class

...Europol ; help combat terrorism by introducing the obligation to create a SIS alert in cases related to terrorist offences and a new 'inquiry check' to help authorities gather essential information; better protect children by allowing authorities to issue, in addition to alerts for missing children, preventive alerts for children who are at high risk of abduction; contribute to the effective enforcement of entry bans for third-country nationals at the external border by making their introduction in the SIS compulsory; improve the enforcement of return decisions issued to irregularly staying third-country nationals by introducing a new alert category for retur ...[+++]n decisions; make more effective use of data such as facial imaging and palm prints to identify persons entering the Schengen area; strengthen the support for prevention and investigation of theft and counterfeiting by providing for alerts to be issued on a wider range of stolen and falsified goods and documents. ...

Considering the diverging practices of Member States concerning the definition of the point in time when an alert fulfils its purpose it is appropriate to set out detailed criteria for each alert category to determine when it should be deleted from SIS II.

Following the effective intervention of the Commission in proposing solutions for a more intensive use of this alert category the statistics show a more than 30 % increase in the number of such alerts.

Each year the Agency shall publish statistics showing the number of records per category of alert, the number of hits per category of alert and how many times the SIS II was accessed, in total and for each Member State.