Traduction de «compte de réduction de valeur » (Français → Anglais) :

(11) In order to promote cost-effective achievement of the national emission reduction commitments and of the intermediate emission levels, Member States should be entitled to account for emission reductions from international maritime traffic if emissions from that sector are lower than the levels of emissions that would result from compliance with Union law standards, including the sulphur limits for fuels set in Directive 1999/32/EC of the Council.[21] Member States should also have the possibility to jointly meet their commitments ...[+++] and intermediate emission levels regarding methane (CH4) and of making use of Decision n°406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council for so doing.[22] For the purpose of checking compliance with their national emission ceilings, emission reduction commitments and intermediate emission levels, Member States could adjust their national emission inventories in view of improved scientific understanding and methodologies regarding emissions.

16. Emphasises the fact that institutional self-restraint in the 7 legislature, considering the level of relevant inflation rates, has resulted in a reduction of Parliament's budget in real terms for 2012 and 2014; notes that once exceptional and non-recurrent expenditure, such as Union enlargements or other expenditure linked to the entry in force of the Treaty of Lisbon, European elections and the financing of building projects were taken out, it showed a decrease in five years out of six (2009, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014); stresses, furthermore, that the Members' allowances have been frozen since 2011, the travel expenditure for Memb ...[+++]ers and staff have been reduced by 5 % and the staff mission allowances have not been indexed since 2007;

17. Emphasises the fact that institutional self-restraint in the seventh legislature, considering the level of relevant inflation rates, has resulted in a reduction of Parliament's budget in real terms for 2012 and 2014; notes that once exceptional and non-recurrent expenditure, such as Union enlargements or other expenditure linked to the entry in force of the Treaty of Lisbon, European elections and the financing of building projects were taken out, it showed a decrease in five years out of six (2009, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014); stresses, furthermore, that the Members' allowances have been frozen since 2011, the travel expenditure fo ...[+++]r Members and staff have been reduced by 5 % and the staff mission allowances have not been indexed since 2007;

Taking into account the value of the covered monies calculated annually as referred to in the first subparagraph, and taking into account developments in the financial markets and the need to ensure effective compensation for investors, the Commission shall also be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 13a to amend the minimum value of the target fund level.

27. Regrets that this flagship communication fails to set out any targets to put resource efficiency as an overarching EU policy priority; stresses the urgent need to mainstream resource efficiency across policy fields, such as agriculture, transport and energy; insists the EU needs to start moving towards a recycling economy with real pricing that reflects true environmental costs and ensures a reduction in waste production, and the value of reusing resources; stresses that environmental sustainability depends on an absolute reduction in resource use; is disappointed the ...[+++] flagship does not mention Europe’s ecological footprint, as this is a clear indicator of our unsustainable use of resources; calls on the Commission to come up with a set of indicators to this effect so that they can be monitored in the next Annual Growth Survey;

29. Stresses that environmental sustainability depends on an absolute reduction in resource use; stresses the need to use the current economic crisis for a shift towards a fully renewables based, highly efficient economy; stresses that if Europe’s industry is to succeed in minimizing the use of carbon rich materials as a source of energy and reduce drastically the use of natural resources altogether, rapid and massive transformation is needed; calls in this perspective for the adoption of an ambitious resource efficiency improvement target; in this regard welcomes the flagship initiative ‘Resource efficient Europe’ and an ‘industrial ...[+++] policy for the globalisation era’, notes however the absence of policy instruments to deliver the needed change; calls on the Commission to bring forward its analysis of how to achieve the industrial shift towards a fully renewables based, highly efficient economy, revise its work programme and present policy proposals; deeply regrets that the European Council only adopted a position on energy efficiency without any mention of resource efficiency;