Traduction de «juger une infraction » (Français → Anglais) :

(2) An accused who is charged with an offence under subsection (1) may be tried and punished by any court having jurisdiction to try that offence in the place where the offence is alleged to have been committed or in the place where the accused is found, is arrested or is in custody, but where the place where the accused is found, is arrested or is in custody is outside the province in which the offence is alleged to have been committed, no proceedings in respect of that offence shall be commenced in that place without the consent of the Attorney General of that province.

G. whereas, in the absence of the parliament, a number of repressive laws have been passed by the government of President al-Sisi, such as the presidential decree Law 136 of 2014 designating all public property as military installations, the most immediate consequence of which is that any crime committed on public property can be tried in military courts and with retroactive effect; whereas the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, in interpreting the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (to which Egypt is a state ...[+++]party), has said that military courts should not, in any circumstances whatsoever, have jurisdiction over civilians;

G. whereas, in the absence of the parliament, a number of repressive laws have been passed by the government of President al-Sisi, such as the presidential decree Law 136 of 2014 designating all public property as military installations, the most immediate consequence of which is that any crime committed on public property can be tried in military courts and with retroactive effect; whereas the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, in interpreting the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (to which Egypt is a state ...[+++] party), has said that military courts should not, in any circumstances whatsoever, have jurisdiction over civilians;

15. Welcomes the shorter timeframes needed for investigating alleged infringements through use of the pilot project method, but considers that clarification and further information is needed from the Commission in order for Parliament to be able to judge the success of this method from the point of view of actual compliance by Member States;

15. Welcomes the shorter timeframes needed for investigating alleged infringements through use of the pilot project method, but considers that clarification and further information is needed from the Commission in order for Parliament to be able to judge the success of this method from the point of view of actual compliance by Member States;

232. 232 Notes that it is the Commission's responsibility to ensure that EU legislation is implemented by the Member States; notes that the average infringement case takes three years before a final judgment is handed down and that there have only ever been two cases where a Member State was fined for not implementing EU legislation; is concerned that enlargement will increase the workload of the Commission with regard to its monitoring of the implementation of legislation and will further slow the infringement procedure; is concerned that no Commissioner is responsible for such an important issue; urges the incoming Commission Presi ...[+++]dent to include special responsibility for infringements in the portfolio of one of the new Commissioners;