Traduction de «juridiction étatique » (Français → Anglais) :

Question No. 218 Mr. Bill Casey: With respect to acts of torture committed in the private sphere in Canada: (a) how many Canadian organizations and individuals have written to the Minister of Justice over the past five years requesting to make these acts illegal in Canada and to make Canada a designated torture free zone; (b) what official discussions or conferences have taken place within Justice Canada in regards to this request; (c) why is non-state actor torture not named or listed as a specific crime in the Criminal Code; (d) does the government intend to make changes to the Criminal Code to correct this omission; (e) what official discussions or decisions have been made by the Minister of Justice or officials of Justice Canada on ...[+++]the designation of Canada as a torture-free zone; (f) has Justice Canada studied the laws of other jurisdictions or countries on the specific issue of defining non-state actor torture as a crime; (g) what official discussions or decisions have occurred within Justice Canada, involving the Minister of Justice, to recognize that there are various forms of non-state actor torture in Canada; and (h) what services, programs or policies does Justice Canada use to support Canadians who have been victims of non-state actor torture?

G. considers that those covered by measures and decisions of sports tribunals are still, first and foremost, subject to national law, which should safeguard their legal position; thus, the autonomy of the rules of sport does not allow them to be considered to be assigned to dispense judicial protection exclusively, in consideration of the absolute, institutionalised primacy of national courts, which, therefore, excludes all limitation of their constitutional prerogatives,

43. Calls for clarification of the jurisdiction of the proposed International Criminal Court in relation to terrorist acts by non-state actors;

He recommended that the Court reply as follows: 1. A national tax affecting domestic aviation and imposing a standard charge in two parts which is calculated by reference, first, to data on fuel consumption and, secondly, to data on emissions of hydrocarbons and nitric oxides, both on an average flight of the type of aircraft used, constitutes an excise duty on the use of aviation fuel, which, in so far as it is applied to aviation other than private pleasure flying, i.e. commercial aviation, is contrary to Article 8(1)(b) of Council Directive 92/81/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on mineral oils, unless it is shown that those calculations ensure that the tax genuinely and significantly advanc ...[+++]e an environmental object of encouraging the use of less polluting aircraft; 2. Article 8(1)(b) of Directive 92/81/EEC is directly effective so that it may be relied upon by an individual against a State authority before a national court.

Article 9 of the CCM requires ratifying states to take appropriate legal and administrative measures to implement the convention, including criminalizing “any activity” prohibited under the CCM that is “undertaken by persons or on territory under its jurisdiction or control,” including, for example, any activities of non-state armed groups.

Article 9 of the CCM requires ratifying states to take appropriate legal and administrative measures to implement the convention, including criminalizing “any activity” prohibited under the CCM that is “undertaken by persons or on territory under its jurisdiction or control,” including, for example, any activities of non-state armed groups.