Traduction de «pourvoi marque » (Français → Anglais) :

jurisdiction of Community trade mark courts of second instance - further appeal

appeal [ lodge an appeal | enter an appel | bring an appeal ]

trademark [ manufacturer's trademark | product brand | service mark | stamp of origin | trade mark | trade mark licences(UNBIS) ]

appeal by leave [ appeal brought by leave ]

appeal [ appeal in cassation | appeal to a higher authority | appeal to the Court of Cassation | means of appeal | means of redress | review procedure ]

Community trade mark regulation | Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark | EU trade mark Regulation | European Union trade mark Regulation | Regulation (EU) 2015/2424 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) | Regulation on the Community trade mark | CTMR [Abbr.]

EU trade mark [ Community trademark | Community trade mark | European trademark | European trade mark | European Union trade mark | EUTM ]

established brand | name brand | primary brand

branded generic

The appellant claims that incorrect assessment criteria were used in determining whether there was a permissible difference in actual use of the trade mark cited in opposition under Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.

The appellant claims that Article 15(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark has been infringed. In particular, three errors of law are relied on:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 February 2013 in Case T-159/11 Marszalkowski v OHIM — Mar-Ko Fleischwaren (WALICHNOWY MARKO), by which the General Court dismissed the action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 January 2011 (Case R 760/2010-4) which annulled the decision of the Opposition Division dismissing the opposition brought by the proprietor of the Community word mark ‘Mar-Ko’ in respect of goods in Class 29 of the Nice Agreement — Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark ( ...[+++]OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1) and Article 48(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 September 2012 in Case T-220/11 TeamBank v OHMI — Fercredit Servizi Finanziari, by which the General Court dismissed the action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 February 2011 (Case R 719/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Fercredit Servizi Finanziari SpA and TeamBank AG Nürnberg — Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1) — Likelihood of confusion between a figurative sign including the word element ‘f@ir Credit’ and a ...[+++]n earlier international figurative mark including the word element ‘FERCREDIT’.