Traduction de «terrain sans propriétaire » (Français → Anglais) :

G. whereas the land law in force in Spain grants land owners 90 % of the building rights and the specific nature of the LRAU requires owners, in the event of the approval of an integrated development plan (plan de actuación integrada – PAI) by a local authority, to surrender not only 10 % of their building rights to the municipality without compensation as "patrimonio municipal de suelo" (municipal land), but also the land for any paths, roads, car parks, public spaces and public facilities, or to pay the development costs decided by the developer of the new infrastructure, a procedure over which the owner has no control whatsoever,

G. whereas current property law in Spain grants property owners 90 % of construction rights and the specific nature of the LRAU requires property owners, in the event of the approval of a land development project (Plan de actuación integrada – PAI) by a local authority, to cede a minimum of 10 % of their property to the municipality as ‘Patrimonio Municipal Suelo’ (municipal land asset), together with the land for any paths, roads, car parks etc., public areas and public facilities, or pay development costs decided by the developer of that new infrastructure, a procedure over which the owner has no control,

That this question is even being placed before the Ontario Municipal Board is a constitutional perversion, since this matter is no longer a planning issue but one rather of the NCC seeking to recast its statutory and constitutional purpose from that of public servant commissioner, conforming with the local city planning authority in stewardship of the lands, to an unaccountable private land owner, land speculator.

As time as gone by, all the obligations laid down in the Directive are falling on the owners of Natura 2000 land, but the subsidies provided for Article 8 of the Directive are not arriving; the result has been rejection of the Directive throughout society, including on the part of the landowners who form part of the Natura 2000 network.

64. Notes that Promotion Leopold (a subsidiary of S.A. SEL) in the case of the D4-D5 buildings, and S.A. Immomills Louis De Waele Development in the case of the Ardenne building forwarded documents establishing exclusive rights over the sites concerned, notes that SA Promotion Leopold is the outright owner of 11 % of the D4-D5 sites and has a purchase option on 89 % of the other D4-D5 sites, enabling it to acquire ownership of them at any time up to 6 April 2005, the date on which the option will expire (purchase option agreement of 6 April 2000 between the SNCB and SA Promotion Leopold) whereas SA Immomills Louis De Waele Development acquired the "Ardenne" site by a contract of sale ...[+++] dated 23 January 1998 ;

63. Notes that Promotion Leopold (a subsidiary of S.A. SEL) in the case of the D4-D5 buildings, and S.A. Immomills Louis De Waele Development in the case of the Ardenne building forwarded documents establishing exclusive rights over the sites concerned, notes that SA Promotion Leopold is the outright owner of 11 % of the D4-D5 sites and has a purchase option on 89 % of the other D4-D5 sites, enabling it to acquire ownership of them at any time up to 6 April 2005, the date on which the option will expire (purchase option agreement of 6 April 2000 between the SNCB and SA Promotion Leopold) whereas SA Immomills Louis De Waele Development acquired the ’Ardenne’ site by a contract of sale ...[+++] dated 23 January 1998;