Traduction de «Giudiziario » (Italien → Anglais) :

judicial power

judicial reform

judicial winding-up order

ordinary court of law [ county court | court of bankruptcy | court of first instance | court of justice | district court ]

crime reporter | forensic journalist | crime and defence correspondent | crime journalist

court proceedings

12. Welcomes the adoption of the Strategy and the Action Plan on the reform of the judiciary 2013-2018, built around the key principles of independence, impartiality, competence, quality of the judiciary and freedom from political interference; urges the authorities to intensify this reform in line with the recommendations of the Venice Commission, especially with regard to the role of the parliament in judicial appointments and the independence of the prosecution, and with a view to the screening process of Chapter 23, which commenced on 25 September 2013; stresses the importance of strengthening the independence of High Judicial and ...[+++]State Prosecutorial Councils and reducing the backlog of cases, as a necessary condition for the successful sequencing of the entire reform process; calls on the authorities to provide all the necessary resources for the Judicial Academy, which should be instrumental in guaranteeing merit-based recruitments; emphasises the need for continuous training of judges and prosecutors to deal with complex financial cases and economic crimes; urges the authorities responsible to ensure a transparent and merit-based process of appointment of judges and prosecutors as well as a solid track-record of disciplinary proceedings against the judicial personnel; insists further on the need to ensure timely justice together with the unification of jurisprudence, the publication of, and easy access to, all judicial decisions immediately after adoption and the random allocation of cases in all courts; is concerned about the legal uncertainty arising from the number of judges carrying out their duties in acting capacity; reiterates the fact that a strong and independent judiciary is key to Serbia’s capacity to meet EU membership criteria;

9. Stresses that the reform of the Turkish judiciary system is central to the efforts to bring about democratic consolidation in Turkey and an indispensable prerequisite for Turkey’s modernisation, and that such reform must lead to a modern, efficient, fully independent and impartial judicial system guaranteeing due process of law for all citizens; welcomes the third judicial reform package as a step towards a comprehensive reform process in the area of the judiciary and fundamental rights; stresses, however, the crucial importance of continuing the reform process by (a) addressing the excessively broad definition of criminal offences ...[+++]and, in particular, what constitutes an act of terrorism under the Penal Code or the Anti-Terror Law, with the urgent need to introduce a clear distinction between, on the one hand, the promotion of terrorism and the incitement to violence and, on the other hand, the expression of non-violent ideas, in full compliance with ECtHR case law, in order to safeguard freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, including student protests, and freedom of association; (b) addressing the issue of excessively long pre-trial detention periods; (c) addressing the need to allow full access to the prosecution file for defence lawyers; (d) setting criteria to promote the quality and consistency of evidence; and (e) reviewing the role and scope of special courts; welcomes, in this regard, the adoption of the fourth reform package by the TGNA and looks forward to its speedy implementation;

13. Notes the progress in the reform of the judiciary, including in reducing the backlog of cases in the courts, in adopting measures to reinforce the independence, accountability, impartiality and efficiency of judges and prosecutors, one of the key priorities, and in the more systematic application by the Judicial and Prosecution Council of the disciplinary proceedings against suspected judges and prosecutors; invites the Montenegrin Parliament to adopt constitutional provisions which would reinforce the legal independence and accountability of the judiciary, enhance judicial independence and the professional autonomy of the Judicial ...[+++]and Prosecution Council; underlines the need to more efficiently monitor corruption and conflict-of-interest rules; calls for the streamlining of the court system to enhance judicial efficiency, given that Montenegro continues to be one of the countries with the highest number per capita of basic courts, magistrates, prosecutors and administrative staff in Europe;

13. Notes the progress in the reform of the judiciary, including in reducing the backlog of cases in the courts, in adopting measures to reinforce the independence, accountability, impartiality and efficiency of judges and prosecutors, one of the key priorities, and in the more systematic application by the Judicial and Prosecution Council of the disciplinary proceedings against suspected judges and prosecutors; invites the Montenegrin Parliament to adopt constitutional provisions which would reinforce the legal independence and accountability of the judiciary, enhance judicial independence and the professional autonomy of the Judicial ...[+++]and Prosecution Council; underlines the need to more efficiently monitor corruption and conflict-of-interest rules; calls for the streamlining of the court system to enhance judicial efficiency, given that Montenegro continues to be one of the countries with the highest number per capita of basic courts, magistrates, prosecutors and administrative staff in Europe;