Traduction de «Parere motivato del PE » (Italien → Anglais) :

1. Emphasises that the Lisbon Treaty gives national parliaments a substantially stronger role in vetting compliance with the principle of subsidiarity, by introducing two specific mechanisms; in each case, national parliaments will have a period of eight weeks (which the Commission is obliged to grant them) in which to react to legislative proposals; first, if one-third of the chambers of the parliaments in the EU give a reasoned opinion that a given legislative proposal does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity, the Commission will be obliged to reconsider it; second, if a majority of the chambers of the parliaments of the U ...[+++]nion give a reasoned opinion opposing a draft legislative act on the ground that it fails to comply with the principle of subsidiarity, both the European Parliament and the Council will have to vote on that question before Parliament makes any pronouncement in first reading on the substance;

5. The board of the offeree company shall draw up and make public a document setting out its opinion of the bid and the reasons on which it is based, including its views on the effects of implementation of the bid on all the company’s interests and specifically employment, and on the offeror’s strategic plans for the offeree company and their likely repercussions on employment and the locations of the company’s places of business as set out in the offer document in accordance with Article 6(3)(i).

On 18 October 2001, the Commission received a reply to this reasoned opinion from the Greek authorities.

Having, on 12 September 2000, sent the Greek authorities a letter of formal notice on the tax on yachts introduced by Article 11 of the Law No 2743/99, the Commission issued a reasoned opinion, which was sent on 26 July 2001.

In a letter of 11 October replying to the reasoned opinion, the Netherlands government stated that it could not accept the Commission's position that it had failed to fulfil its obligations pursuant to the EIA directive with regard to dyke sections 10-15 in the district of Sliedrecht.

In its reasoned opinion of 18 July, the Commission stated that the Kingdom of the Netherlands had not fulfilled the obligations deriving from Articles 2(1) and 4(2) of the directive as regards a number of dyke projects in the district of Sliedrecht not yet carried out (dyke sections 10-15).