Traduction de «Provvedimento giurisdizionale » (Italien → Anglais) :

It does not include a provisional, including protective, measure which is ordered by such a court or tribunal without the defendant being summoned to appear, unless the judgment containing the measure is served on the defendant prior to enforcement.

39. Is aware of the Commission appeal against the General Court judgment in the latest case of Kadi v. Commission ; calls on all actors to carry out a thorough revision of the sanctions regime and ensure it is fully in line with international human rights standards and the rule of law, in accordance with all relevant case law; takes the view that those targeted by sanctions should be given the information that substantiates their targeting and be entitled to effective judicial remedy;

P. whereas under Article 12 of the Act of 1976 it is the European Parliament – and the European Parliament alone – that verifies the credentials of its Members elected by universal suffrage; whereas this fundamental prerogative of the European Parliament may not be challenged or, still less, invalidated by a decision adopted by national authorities in clear breach of the relevant rules and principles of Community law, even if that decision was finally adopted by the supreme judicial body of the relevant State, as was the case with the ruling of the Italian Council of State that is at issue here; whereas in its case-law the Court of Ju ...[+++]stice has confirmed the validity of this prerogative, including vis-à-vis final national rulings handed down in breach of Community law, and has found against the State,

P. whereas under Article 12 of the Act of 1976 it is the European Parliament – and the European Parliament alone – that verifies the credentials of its Members elected by universal suffrage; whereas this fundamental prerogative of the European Parliament may not be challenged or, still less, invalidated by a decision adopted by national authorities in clear breach of the relevant rules and principles of Community law, even if that decision was finally adopted by the supreme judicial body of the relevant State, as was the case with the ruling of the Italian Council of State that is at issue here; whereas in its case-law the Court of Ju ...[+++]stice has confirmed the validity of this prerogative, including vis-à-vis final national rulings handed down in breach of Community law, and has found against the State,

6. If a court has issued an order on non-return pursuant to Article 13 of the 1980 Hague Convention, the court must immediately either directly or through its central authority, transmit a copy of the court order on non-return and of the relevant documents, in particular a transcript of the hearings before the court, to the court with jurisdiction or central authority in the Member State where the child was habitually resident immediately before the wrongful removal or retention, as determined by national law.

The sound operation of the internal market creates a need to have clear rules on jurisdiction and to improve and speed up the recognition and enforcement of judgements in civil and commercial matters.