Traduction de «impresa comune » (Italien → Anglais) :

European Joint Undertaking [ ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking | BBI Joint Undertaking | Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking | Clean Sky Joint Undertaking | ECSEL Joint Undertaking | ENIAC Joint Undertaking | FCH Joint Undertaking | FCH JU | Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking | Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking | IMI Joint Undertaking | S2R Joint Undertaking | S2R JU | SESAR Joint Undertaking | Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking ]

joint venture [ joint enterprise | joint undertaking ]

Joint undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR) | SESAR Joint Undertaking | SESAR JU [Abbr.] | SJU [Abbr.]

IMI Joint Undertaking | Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking | Joint Undertaking for the implementation of the Joint Technology Initiative on Innovative Medicines | IMI JU [Abbr.]

FCH Joint Undertaking | Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking | FCH JU [Abbr.]

federal business | federal government-associated business | federal enterprise | government-owned company

bereavement manager | funeral home worker | cemetery manager | funeral services director

start-up | start-up business | start-up company | start-up firm

family business | family-run company | family firm

7. Acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that in addition to the improvements to its ex post audit strategy, an action plan was submitted which aims to remedy the deficiencies identified by the Court in its qualified opinion; acknowledges receipt from the Joint Undertaking of the last update with regard to the ex-post audit implementation in the Joint Undertaking; awaits the Court's opinion on the new formula proposed for the calculation of an estimated residual error rate in the Joint Undertaking’s transactions; notes that the implementation of the action plan commenced in 2014; looks forward to the successful implementation of th ...[+++]e entire action plan as well as to the Court's opinion on its outcome; points out that difficulties may arise as to the boundaries between NFA's sovereign authority and the Joint Undertaking's authority; calls on the Joint Undertaking to provide a first interim evaluation report on the implementation of the action plan;

6. Acknowledges from the Joint Undertaking that an action plan, was submitted which aims to remedy the deficiencies identified by the Court in its qualified opinion; acknowledges receipt from the Joint Undertaking of the last update with regard to the ex-post audit implementation in the Joint Undertaking; awaits the Court’s opinion on the new formula proposed for the calculation of an estimated residual error rate in the Joint Undertaking’s transactions; notes that the implementation of the action plan commenced in 2014; looks forward to the successful implementation of the entire action plan, as well as to the opinion of the Court o ...[+++]n its outcome; points out that difficulties may arise on the boundary between the NFA's sovereign authority and the Joint Undertaking's authority; calls on the Joint Undertaking to provide a first interim evaluation report on the implementation of the action plan;

4. Is concerned that the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking received a qualified opinion from the Court of Auditors on the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts on the grounds that the error rate resulting from the ex-post audits was 6,84%; takes note that the Joint Undertaking completed ex-post audits covering 2,2 million euro (18,8 % of accepted Joint Undertaking's contribution for the first call validated by the Joint Undertaking by June 2011); regrets that based on Joint Undertaking first audits applying its own methodology the detected error rate was 4,58 % while the residual error rate wa ...[+++]s 3,72 %; expects that the Court and the Joint Undertaking agree on an audit methodology that for the same ex-post audits delivers the same results, reiterates that the Joint Undertaking should reinforce without delay the quality of its ex-ante controls in particular for the grant management, requests that the discharge authority is informed of the results of the following ex-post audit processes conducted by the Joint Undertaking;

4. Is concerned that the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking received a qualified opinion from the Court of Auditors on the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts on the grounds that the error rate resulting from the ex post audits was 6,84%; takes note that the Joint Undertaking completed ex post audits covering EUR 2,2 million (18,8 % of accepted Joint Undertaking's contribution for the first call validated by the Joint Undertaking by June 2011); regrets that on the basis of the Joint Undertaking's first audits applying its own methodology, the detected error rate was 4,58 % while the residual ...[+++]error rate was 3,72 %; expects that the Court of Auditors and the Joint Undertaking agree on an audit methodology that for the same ex post audits delivers the same results; reiterates that the Joint Undertaking should reinforce without delay the quality of its ex ante controls, in particular for the grants management; requests that the discharge authority is informed of the results of the following ex post audit processes conducted by the Joint Undertaking;