Traduction de «Desistenza da un procedimento » (Italien → Anglais) :

The role of victims in the criminal justice system and whether they can participate actively in criminal proceedings vary across Member States, depending on the national system, and is determined by one or more of the following criteria: whether the national system provides for a legal status as a party to criminal proceedings; whether the victim is under a legal requirement or is requested to participate actively in criminal proceedings, for example as a witness; and/or whether the victim has a legal entitlement under national law to participate actively in criminal proceedings and is seeking to do so, where the national system does n ...[+++]ot provide that victims have the legal status of a party to the criminal proceedings.

(3) the United Kingdom and Ireland have made use of their right to opt out.

Just as the European Union must exercise equal guidance to the Palestinians to desist from violence, so that both may achieve their objectives for secure statehood through the only available effective means, which are peaceful means.

1. Where, in a Member State, the court fees for civil proceedings within the meaning of point (a) or point (b) of Article 17(1), as applicable, are equivalent to or higher than those of the European order for payment procedure, the total of the court fees for a European order for payment procedure and for the civil proceedings that ensue in the event of a statement of opposition in accordance with Article 17(1) shall not exceed the fees for those proceedings without a preceding European order for payment procedure in that Member State.

Unlike, say, an entitlement to seek an injunction, the right of reply, as a matter of principle, may not only be exercised in relation to untrue or otherwise unlawful initial utterances, but also entails an obligation to publish an opposing view even when the statements made were true and lawful.

2. Exceptionally , the procedure may be repeated if there is proof of new facts or circumstances which emerged after the judgment and which could not reasonably have been discovered by the prosecuting authorities at the time of the trial or if there was a fundamental error in the previous procedure which could have affected the outcome of the proceedings, in accordance with the criminal law and the criminal procedure of the Member State of the proceedings, provided that, according to the law of the Member State of proceedings, such a fresh procedure would be competent by way of a vertical application of ne bis in idem .