Traduction de «hands-on offence » (Anglais → Français) :

hands-on offence [ hands-on offense | hands-on sexual offence | hands-on sexual offense ]

hands-off offence [ hands-off offense | hands-off sexual offence | hands-off sexual offense ]

identical offence | re-offence | repeated offence | serial offence | similar offence

traffic offence [ driving offence | road traffic offence ]

offence against sexual integrity | sex offence | sexual offence

economic offence [ banco | boiler room | bonko | bunco | bunko | con | confidence game | confidence trick | con job | economic crime | false bill | false invoice | Ponzi | Ponzi game | Ponzi scheme | pyramid scheme | scam | shady deal | shell game | swindle | Accounting fraud(STW) ]

motoring offence | road traffic offence | traffic offence

Definition: Disorder involving persistent dissocial or aggressive behaviour (meeting the overall criteria for F91.- and not merely comprising oppositional, defiant, disruptive behaviour) occurring in individuals who are generally well integrated into their peer group. | Conduct disorder, group type Group delinquency Offences in the context of gang membership Stealing in company with others Truancy from school

hybrid offence [ compound offense | dual procedure offence | dual-procedure offence | dual-process offence | dual offence | mixed offence | compound offence ]

[4] CY law specifies what is regarded as "sufficient information", for example the full name, date and place of birth of the individual in respect of whom the conviction has been handed down; the date of the conviction, name of the court and the date on which the decision became final; information on the offence leading to the conviction and, specifically, the date the offence was committed, the name or legal definition of the offence, and the references of the legal provisions applied; information on the content of the conviction ...[+++]and, chiefly, on the offence, any additional sanctions, security measures and subsequent decisions amending the execution of the conviction.

The Commission adopted an amended proposal in September 2009 in order to, on the one hand, take into account the resolution of the European Parliament and the results of negotiations in the Council, and, on the other hand, introduce the possibility for Member States' law enforcement authorities and Europol to access the EURODAC central database for the purposes of prevention, detection and investigation of terrorist offences and other serious criminal offences.

If the administering State adopts the procedure of conversion of the penalty, that State (a) will be bound by the findings as to the facts in so far as they appear explicitly or implicitly in the judgment handed down in the sentencing State; (b) may, unless it has made a declaration to the contrary, convert a custodial penalty into a financial penalty if the penalty is less than or equal to a period of six months; and (c) may not aggravate the penal position of the sentenced person and will not be bound by any minimum penalty which its own law may provide for the offence or offenc ...[+++]es committed (Article 8(5)).

According to the Convention, the sentencing State may request another Contracting State to enforce a sentence only if one or more of the conditions set out in Article 5 are fulfilled, namely: (a) if the sentenced person is ordinarily resident in the other State; (b) if the enforcement of the sentence in the other State is likely to improve the prospects for the social rehabilitation of the sentenced person; (c) if, in the case of a sentence involving deprivation of liberty, the sentence could be enforced following the enforcement of another sentence involving deprivation of liberty which the sentenced person is undergoing or is to undergo in the other State; (d) if the other State is the State of origin of the sentenced person and has de ...[+++]clared itself willing to accept responsibility for the enforcement of that sentence; or (e) if it considers that it cannot itself enforce the sentence, even by having recourse to extradition, and that the other State can. In addition, the judgment handed down in the requesting State must be final and enforceable and the offence in respect of which the sentence has been passed must also constitute an offence under the law of the requested State ("double criminality" requirement [76]).