Traduction de «Comunicazione della sentenza » (Italien → Anglais) :

publication of the judgment | publication of the verdict | publication of the decision

enforcement of ruling [ effect of ruling | force of res judicata | mode of enforcement ]

deliberations on the judgment | judges' deliberations

join for the purposes of the written or oral procedure or the final judgment

granting enforcement by means of exequatur

comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice

judgment of the Court (EU) [ Court of Justice judgment | judgment of the CJEC | judgment of the Court of Justice (EU) | judgment of the EC Court | judgment of the EC Court of Justice ]

higher education communications teacher | professor of communications | communications instructor | communications lecturer

ruling [ court decision | court judgment | court ruling ]

The Court held at paragraph 100 of judgment of 18 July 2013, Commission v Kadi and Others (C‑584/10 P, C‑593/10 P, C‑595/10 P, EU:C:2013:518), that Article 47 of the Charter requires disclosure of sufficient information ‘so as to make it possible for’ litigants to defend their rights ‘in the best possible conditions and to decide, with full knowledge of the relevant facts, whether there is any point in . applying to the court having jurisdiction, and in order to put the latter fully in a position to review the lawfulness of the decision in question’.

Since EPSO did not respond to the requests for the production of documents within the time-limits referred to in paragraph 50 above, the time-limits available to the applicant for lodging a complaint within the meaning of Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations against the decision not to send her written test (b) and against the decision not to send written test (c) expired on 14 September 2009 and 28 October 2009 respectively.

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 November 2011 in Case T-296/09 EFIM v Commission by which the General Court dismissed an application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 4125 of 20 May 2009 rejecting complaint COMP/C-3/39.391 concerning alleged infringements of Articles 81 EC and 82 EC by Hewlett-Packard, Lexmark, Canon and Epson in the market for ink cartridges — Powers of the Commission — Obligations regarding the investigation of complaints — No Community interest — Proportionality — Failure to state reasons — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Commission Notice on the ha ...[+++]ndling of complaints

In order to avoid this Regulation being applied to circumvent the conditions identified in the Altmark judgment, and in order to avoid de minimis aid granted under this Regulation affecting trade due to its cumulation with other compensation for the same service of general economic interest, de minimis aid under this Regulation should not be cumulated with any other compensation in respect of the same service, regardless of whether or not it constitutes State aid under the Altmark judgment or compatible State aid under Decision 2012/21/EU or under the Communication from the Commission — European Union framework for State aid in the form ...[+++]of public service compensation (2011) (8).