Traduction de «Diritto d'opzione » (Italien → Anglais) :

2. Urges the Commission to undertake a thorough impact assessment of the option deemed most appropriate; stresses that this impact assessment should include, inter alia, identification of the most suitable legal basis, social and economic impacts, coherence with existing EU, international and private law, possible systems of arbitration in cases of conflict regarding the choice and application of the optional instrument between consumers and businesses, and the level of added value for consumers and businesses of such an optional instrument; considers that this impact assessment should be completed and concerns addressed before work co ...[+++]mmences on the chosen policy option;

The rapporteur takes the view that the option of setting up an optional instrument (OI) for European Contract Law by virtue of a regulation (Option 4) is to be favoured.

D. whereas in the light of this ambitious plan and the huge achievements already made by the EU in this field, it is time to stand back and reflect on what we are doing in the field of civil law with a view primarily to adopting a more strategic and less fragmented approach based on the real needs of citizens and businesses when exercising their rights and freedoms in the single market, and taking account of the difficulties of legislating in an area of shared competence where harmonisation is only infrequently an option and overlapping needs to be avoided, and where there is a consequent need to respect and accommodate radically differ ...[+++]ent legal approaches and constitutional traditions, and also with a view to conceptualising the Union's approach to this area in order better to understand what we are seeking to accomplish and how best to tackle the problems that have to be confronted, as part of an overall plan; whereas it is essential to focus in the first place on ensuring the functionality of the measures that have already been put in place and consolidating the progress that has already been made,

This law in fact only treats the use of these languages as an option, and it views this option only in a negative way and not as a positive right, failing to regard it as a right that can be demanded and applied in everyday life.

for exercising the Agency’s exclusive right to conclude supply contracts for nuclear materials and its right of option,

In the case of Member States’ company law where the board (and/or supervisory board) of the offeree company still has discretional power (an alternative option for the “one size fits all” approach of the Commission) the offeror and the shareholders of the offeree company should have adequate access to such procedures; in the case of Member States’ company law where the general meeting of shareholders must give prior authorisation (the preferred option of the Commission’s proposal) the board of the offeree company as well as the employee representatives must have that access.