Traduction de «affrontement réglementaire » (Français → Anglais) :

regulation game [ regulation contest | regulation match ]

first game [ opening game | first contest | opening contest | first match | opening match | season opener ]

regulatory policy [ better lawmaking | better law-making | better regulation | good regulatory practice | outcome-based regulation | performance-based regulation | REFIT | regulatory fitness | Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme | regulatory governance | regulatory improvement | regulatory quality | regulatory reform | smart regulation ]

Regulatory documentation

regulatory requirements

LEI Regulatory Oversight Committee | Regulatory Oversight Committee for the Global Legal Entity Identifier System | LEI ROC [Abbr.]

decisive game [ decisive match | final game | final match | winning game | winning match | deciding game | deciding match | rubber game | rubber match ]

regulation [ regulatory provision ]

regulatory process

powers of parliament [ parliamentary power | regulatory autonomy ]

22. Stresses that copyright is an important economic basis for creativity, employment and innovation, as well as the guarantor of cultural diversity, and that it is essential to enable Europe’s creative and cultural industries to compete on a global scale; stresses that further efforts are needed in the field of copyright to strike a balance between all key actors, and that any revision of copyright law should ensure adequate protection that fosters investment and growth in the creative and cultural sector, whilst removing legal uncertainties and inconsistencies that adversely affect the functioning of the Digital Single Market (DSM); urges the Commission to review, where necessary, the regulatory framework for copyright in order to achie ...[+++]ve a better access to creative content for European citizens, and to stimulate European researchers, educational establishments, cultural heritage institutions and the creative sector to adapt their activities to the digital world; underlines that appropriate remuneration must be paid by those who profit from the exploitation of copyright-protected works, and that any solutions in this regard should not discourage the use of legal providers; recalls that digital technologies have redefined the value chain in the cultural sector, mostly to the benefit of intermediaries and often to the detriment of creators; asks the Commission to investigate the extent and impact of such changes and to propose measures to improve the remuneration of authors and artists at European level; stresses that any revised provisions should be future-proof and technologically neutral, evidence based and carefully assessed in line with the Commission’s objective of better regulation, while taking into account the differences between the digital and analogical environments;

6. Considers it regrettable that, so far, the EU has kept its government procurement markets largely open to international competition, while EU companies still face substantial barriers abroad; calls on the Commission to guarantee that EU trade agreements contain instruments for our companies, especially SMEs, to compete abroad on equal terms with foreign national companies; demands as well clear regulation of, and easy access to information concerning, tenders and awarding criteria, and the lifting of discriminatory and unjustified trade barriers in the field of government procurement, services or investment (such as fiscal discrimin ...[+++]ation, regulatory barriers to the establishment of branches or subsidiaries, and restrictions on access to financing); calls on our partner countries to apply principles of open government in order to guarantee transparency and avoid conflicts of interest, and to use PPPs practice with caution, taking into account not only cost-benefit analyses and the viability of the projects, but also the financial and technical capacity of public authorities to supervise services or infrastructure delivery in line with general public interest;

In the last decade, these infrastructure projects have faced growing legislative and regulatory complexity, characterized by lengthy and often duplicative regulatory processes.

This text also addresses the question of tax havens, i.e. those states and jurisdictions which live off lax regulations, transactions conducted with a lack of transparency and a guarantee of anonymity, a very low level of taxation and minimum international judicial and tax cooperation.